The US Trade Representative (USTR) has announced plans to seek public comments on proposed Section 301 actions targeting China’s maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors. These measures, which may include port fees of up to $1.5 million per Chinese vessel docking in the US, are intended to counter what the US describes as China’s dominance in these industries.
However, concerns are growing over whether such restrictions could undermine US interests. Experts argue that these measures may:
🔹 Increase shipping costs, contributing to inflation in the US
🔹 Weaken US competitiveness in global trade by raising production costs
🔹 Disrupt supply chains, particularly for industries reliant on maritime logistics
China has firmly opposed the proposed actions, stating that previous Section 301 tariffs were ruled as WTO violations and warning of necessary countermeasures to protect its interests. With strong domestic and international opposition, will these measures achieve their intended goals, or could they ultimately harm US businesses and consumers?
The USTR will hold a public hearing on March 24. How should policymakers balance economic security and trade stability in this context?