In Lahore, a significant legal case unfolded when a man, Muhammad Aurangzeb Khan, found himself in a courtroom facing serious consequences for marrying a second time without obtaining consent from his first wife.
The family court, presided over by Judge Adnan Liaqat, ultimately sentenced Khan to seven months of imprisonment and imposed a hefty fine of Rs500,000. This decision was reached based on Khan’s violation of section 6(5) of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961.
The case stemmed from a petition filed by Zona Nasar, Khan’s first wife, who alleged that Khan had married her in 2011 and subsequently entered into another marriage without her consent. Nasar argued that Khan’s actions contravened the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, which require the consent of existing spouses for subsequent marriages.
During the court proceedings, Nasar presented compelling evidence to support her claims. This evidence included their marriage certificate, their child’s birth certificate and B-Form, and a certified copy of Khan’s second marriage certificate. Additionally, Nasar called upon witnesses to testify, further bolstering her case.
In response, Khan defended himself by asserting that he had obtained his first wife’s permission for the second marriage and denied any wrongdoing regarding the disclosure of his marital status. He also accused the witnesses presented by the prosecution of providing false testimony against him.
To support his defense, Khan submitted various documents, including a lawsuit seeking dissolution of his marriage and complaints alleging misconduct on the part of his first wife. However, despite his efforts to refute the allegations, the court found Khan guilty of the charges brought against him.
This case underscores the importance of adherence to legal frameworks governing marriage and family matters, particularly within the context of Islamic law in Pakistan. It also highlights the significance of obtaining consent from all parties involved in polygamous unions, as mandated by relevant legal statutes.
The court’s decision serves as a reminder of the consequences individuals may face for violating established legal norms and regulations surrounding marriage and familial relations.
